Shifted to MX Linux, based on Debian, with Xfce desktop. Looks not bad in my opinion, but let’s see how it goes. @thelinuxEXP @linux@lemmy.ml @Linux@linuxrocks.online @debian
Wow didn’t know there was a Twitter distro.
@erezac lol🤣. But it seems like a good Debian based os by some people.
You made me exhale heavily through my nostrils. Well played.
@thelinuxEXP @linux@lemmy.ml @Linux@linuxrocks.online @debian A small update. For some reason, MX Linux has a lot of issues while installing software like RStudio, Discord etc. If I can’t fix those somehow, I might hop distro again.
@thelinuxEXP @linux@lemmy.ml @Linux@linuxrocks.online @debian
Update: Switched to Lubuntu to have an experience of LXQT. Let’s hope it doesn’t have those issues.
Honest question, but why not just install Debian with the Xfce DE? Why rely on a fork for updates?
From what I can tell both by testing MX Linux and by reading about it, it’s nothing more than Debian with a few pre-installed packages and some customization. All of which could be done on Debian directly without much trouble.
@packetloss I’ll look into it. Thanks for letting me know
Not saying you have to or anything, and I can understand and respect using something like MX Linux to save time on the customization. Just know that because it’s based on Debian, any core OS updates will be delayed while the MX team rebases them into their fork.
I’m using MX xfce to revive an old laptop that was struggling with Windows 10. I think it looks and feels great considering the performance.
@EthanolParty it feels way better than using Windows 10, no doubt. Even if I had only 1 or 2gb of ram, it might run pretty well, but 4gb, no way to go wrong with it.
 [@linux@lemmy.ml](https://lemmy.ml](https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/110/831/135/429/342/497/original/c7c2592c8ae0ff76.png){kind=link}