• OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hey, my sincere apologies for my other reply. I had too much of Lemmy yesterday… after several DUMBASS replies trolling me (like putting words into my mouth, then ridiculing those straw man concepts - really though, I should have known better than to say that I like Mac OSX, even in a non-Linux, general-technology community, anywhere on the Fediverse, as that never fails to bring out the trolls from under the bridge… whenever will I learn!?:-P), I started to presume guilt everywhere I looked, and essentially unwittingly fed forward that negative behavior onto you, so again my apologies. This community I hope will remain better than that.

      • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Thanks, I was going to let it go because I was sure you just misunderstood what I was saying, and honestly it isn’t worth arguing over. But I appreciate you following up.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Where are you seeing “Latin America” - wait for it - as a continent, on this graph?

      It is to the left of North America, and to the right of Africa, itself after Asia and Europe. In other words, that entire line is the list of continents.

      This is known as the “legend”, which is placed there in order to explain the coloration. e.g. all Latin American nations (consisting of only Brazil & Mexico in this map of only the “biggest countries”) are purple, b/c ‘Latin America’ is colored purple in the legend. And Asian countries are green, USA is red, Africa is orange, European ones are blue.

      Do you see “Latin America” anywhere else, other than the legend? I tried & tried but could not…

      So mystery solved I suppose.

      If you were joking, that was not clear to me.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think Brazil is even part of Latino America either because they speak Portuguese not Spanish. I could be very wrong though.

      • pewter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Portuguese is a romance language so it has Latin roots. Latino would still apply.

        • Evkob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The romance language definition begs the question, are French-Canadians Latino?

          • akilou@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think it’s language and geography. French-canadians meet the first criterion but not the second.