For the uninitiated, generally NSFW is for sexual contents and NSFL is for gory contents. People may want to see one but not see the other at any time for any reason. I have seen this feature requested over the years in Reddit but it never happens. Maybe now some instance can finally implement it?

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve always thought, of all the options to warn us that clicking will put titties on our screen, that “not safe for work” was a bad choice.

    Like, what if your work doesn’t care about titties? What about the tons of other times you wouldn’t want those to pop into your screen without warning, like when you’re on public transit, or sitting next to grandma?

    I’d vote for “LEWD” vs “GORE” or something more clear - users can decide for themselves when it is or isn’t safe.

    • elvith@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Correct, if you work for e.g. Pornhub, NSFW might have a different meaning

      • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can just imagine the HR conversations at Pornhub. “Steve, we have reason to believe that you’ve been viewing non-pornographic material at work.”

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Reminds me of when new episodes of Rick and Morty were being posted on PornHub and they took them down.

        • ricecooker@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Steve, your numbers are down. We have reason to believe you have not been viewing enough pornographic material at work.”

        • Pringles@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I can imagine they don’t want accountants or IT people looking at porn while they work though. Their own websites are probably not filtered, but whether the work is for a porn site or a car manufacturer, you prefer them focussing on their work. For a content reviewer though, it’s a different story.

          That being said, there is not enough money in the world that would convince me to become a content reviewer. The removed they have to sit through is often utterly vile and traumatizing. Here is an article about a facebook moderator as an example: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57088382

          • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was mostly joking, but yeah, being a content reviewer has got to be a soul crushing job. I can’t even imagine the removed you would see.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      My job doesnt care.

      Of course i cant just browse porn all day, but clicking a random picture onnreddit with boobs?

      Nobody cares