Canonical are currently dealing with a security incident with the Snap store, after users noticed multiple fake apps were uploaded so temporary limits have been put in place.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I find the removedting on Snap technology itself unreasonable. I left Ubuntu LTS for Debian Stable partly due to Snaps (and Debian is supreme distro), but the technology itself has a massive advantage over Flatpak if it became more adopted – system integration.

    Malicious actors being able to upload Snaps and them being less vetted is moreso a weakness of FOSS infrastructure underfunding, and not because “snap bad”.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big issue with snaps for me has always been the proprietary backend and that they try to make a new standard instead of improving flatpak which most distros have alrady adopted

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Canonical loves reinventing the wheel instead of using and improving something that already exists. It’s also either source-available (not OSS, as no contributions are possible) or closed-source. Examples are Mir (Wayland), Snaps (flatpak) and Unity (GNOME 3).

        • Fisch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unity wasn’t FOSS? And they tried to make a non-FOSS window manager as well?