Visit about:compat in your firefox. I find it insane that these exist.

Edit: I’ve learned that this is part of the webcompat system addon developed by Mozilla and other contributors. I see why this is beneficial default behavior, since FF has no chance of getting enough market share to matter more if things are broken.

However, this behavior is too intrusive for my taste. For example this injection: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/8a4afb4d34f8/browser/extensions/webcompat/injections/js/bug1472075-bankofamerica.com-ua-change.js is basically just to silence annoying user reports.

Also, Every site FF pretends to be a different UA on is artificially reducing FF market share data.

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are so many legitimate things to complain about with Mozilla, why do people go out of their way to complain about the most innocuous removed.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m starting to think there’s a wave of people realizing that the internet is government surveillance technology and trying to square the circle.

    • mvirts@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol I just happened across it :/ I know there are bigger issues at hand

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        3 months ago

        This isn’t even an issue though, its just to fix bugs with certain websites that block Firefox for no reason or have other weird compatibility issues. Which I would think is a good thing?

        • mvirts@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re right, for a browser meant for the masses it is probably a net benefit. I posted because I was surprised by this hidden behavior that seems better suited for a browser extension. Sneaky behavior like this is what I’m paranoid about in closed software like windows.

          To your point, Linux itself is probably the #1 example of hacky patches to work around other people’s problems.

          • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            3 months ago

            All web browsers have semi hidden pages like this for all sorts of purposes. Its not really intended to be secret, its just not stuff worth even adding to a file menu. Some of the about: pages in firefox are in some submenus, some on settings, but def not all. Tho you’ll fimd them mentioned and linked in support guides.

            If anything, the ability to access these is better than them being blocked…

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think that Sneaky or Secret are good descriptions for this. A better word might be “plumbing”.

            When you realize that your house use full of hidden pipes and wires, it would be a strange take indeed to conclude that anybody is being “sneaky” about these “secret” features.