The problem:

The web has obviously reached a high level of #enremovedification. Paywalls, exclusive walled gardens, #Cloudflare, popups, CAPTCHAs, tor-blockades, dark patterns (esp. w/cookies), javascript that makes the website an app (not a doc), etc.

Status quo solution (failure):

#Lemmy & the #threadiverse were designed to inherently trust humans to only post links to non-removed websites, and to only upvote content that has no links or links to non-removed venues.

It’s not working. The social approach is a systemic failure.

The fix:

• stage 1 (metrics collection): There needs to be removedification metrics for every link. Readers should be able to click a “this link is removed” button on a per-link basis & there should be tick boxes to indicate the particular variety of removed that it is.

• stage 2 (metrics usage): If many links with the same hostname show a pattern of matching enremovedification factors, the Lemmy server should automatically tag all those links with a warning of some kind (e.g. ⚠, 💩, 🌩).

• stage 3 (inclusive alternative): A replacement link to a mirror is offered. E.g. youtube → (non-CF’d invidious instance), cloudflare → archive.org, medium.com → (random scribe.rip instance), etc.

• stage 4 (onsite archive): good samaritans and over-achievers should have the option to provide the full text for a given link so others can read the article without even fighting the site.

• stage 5 (search reranking): whenever a human post a link and talks about it, search crawlers notice and give that site a high ranking. This is why search results have gotten lousy – because the social approach has failed. Humans will post bad links. So links with a high enremovedification score need to be obfuscated in some way (e.g. dots become asterisks) so search crawlers don’t overrate them going forward.

This needs to be recognized as a #LemmyBug.