alias alias-edit="vim ~/.local/config/alias_config && source ~/.local/config/alias_config && echo 'Alias updated. \n'"
alias ls="exa"
alias find="fdfind"
alias battery-full="system76-power charge-thresholds --profile full_charge"
alias battery-balanced="system76-power charge-thresholds --profile balanced"
alias battery-maxhealth="system76-power charge-thresholds --profile max_lifespan"
alias update-flatapt="sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade -y && flatpak update --assumeyes"
alias tree="exa --tree"
alias devi-do="sudo incus exec dev0 -- su -l devi"
alias code="flatpak run com.visualstudio.code"
~
I always do that. Is that bad on pop os/fedora? I wouldn’t know any different. Selectively choose what to update?
Apparently apt has a stroke sometimes. I don’t think I’ve had an update removed up this bad but it’s better to read the output so you know what changed in case something stops working.
That’s by no means a routine upgrade though, the guy just “upgraded to” backports which you’re not even supposed to do. Not comparable to the soothingly boring apt upgrade of Debian stable.
True, it’s just an example to always look at the output. I’ve definitely used that in Fedora to reinstall packages when something stopped working after an upgrade.
(Maybe this doesn’t happen by itself in Debian but I wouldn’t trust Ubuntu for example)