• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I don’t like Snap too, but it has some advantages over Flatpak. And unfortunately the most popular distribution still uses Snap. In example it is easier to create Snap packages and Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins ( Edit: my bad ) , but Snap does (something like grep in example). Also some may like it more that Snap relies on AppArmor instead using the custom solution of Flatpak.

        All in all, its not like black and white which is better. I still wish only one of the formats would exist, because this is not the kind of fragmentation I wish to have. But both exist and the end user should decide which of them to kill.

        • SatyrSack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins

          Where does that misinformation come from? That’s not the first time I’ve heard it. Was that actually true at one point?

          • shapis@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            In think it comes from flathub not having many cli applications in it. I’d love to drop snaps for Flatpak only. But I can get so many snaps that aren’t on flathub it’s crazy.

          • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Maybe you are right. Its something I repeat it myself, after doing a research back when it was new. Given Neovim is available on Flathub, maybe its possible. Maybe it was true at some point. Good catch, I’ll make sure not to repeat that anymore, as I don’t want spread misinformation.

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          the most popular distribution still uses Snap

          Ubuntu is the most popular? On server maybe, on desktop I doubt it.

          Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins

          It is not true. You can install Neovim as flatpak, for example.

          Also some may like it more that Snap relies on AppArmor instead using the custom solution of Flatpak.

          It only means, that on distros without AppArmor you get almost no sandboxing of snap applications.

          The only advantage snap has is the ability to package drivers as snaps. Other than that there’s simply no reason to choose proprietary-backed snap over flatpak.

          EDIT: Typos.

          • caden@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            I am pretty sure Ubuntu is still far and away the most popular desktop distro. For servers I would have guessed it was something like RedHat/CentOS or possibly Debian.

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      What is so hated about snaps? I’ll admit I haven’t used Ubuntu since they started using snaps, but I don’t understand the hate about them in the Linux community.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Burn Snap out of there and I’m in.

    Edit: looks like they’re not putting much towards snaps, it’s mostly Flatpak and systemd-sysext. I’m good with that.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like that snap support is included. You can’t easily add it to immutable distros and there is still some software out there only easily available via snaps.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it’s only there like in KDE Neon, I’m fine with it. I don’t want any of my distro apps to come as Snaps though.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can’t host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open.

        Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

        • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

          I agree but I think it’s the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              This is a stupid argument. In FSF’s eyes even having nonfree repository (ie. for drivers) is bad so this is completely irrelevant for anyone considering flatpak or snap. Both have nonfree stuff in there.

              • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Both have nonfree stuff in there.

                But flatpak’s backend is open source and self-hostable, while snap’s is proprietary and not self-hostable. Flatpak is the lesser of evils from this point of view.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Honestly, why enable this kind of behavior in any way? Any user is free to make an informed choice by installing it themselves.

            We all know how this goes. Once a critical mass is reached, enremovedtification begins to milk everything dry. By making it an installer option, you’re legitimizing it and supporting a worse future for the Linux desktop.

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ok but KDE has official Snap packages so they already are “legitimizing it”. Also snap won’t be able to entremovedtify anything. Snapd is still open source, so you can just repackage the software for different package system.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                My guy. There is no open backend for Snap. If Ubuntu enremovedtifies Snap, nobody can host an alternate backend for them. How does the client being open source help you?

  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The distro is designed to be a bulletproof, highly user-friendly operating system that showcases the best of KDE technology—a system that KDE can confidently recommend to casual users and hardware manufacturers.

    So it looks like there will finally be a distribution that Windows, Mac, and ChromeOS users can jump to and just start using without having to learn much and with a much better and more familiar GUI than GNOME.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I think you’re exactly right, honestly I think this has potential to be huge. Whether we like it or not, in order for a lot of mid-level savvy users to feel comfortable switching over they need a “default” option (like joining mastodon.social) to get their feet wet. A distro specifically built for KDE I think could appeal to a lot of people.

      EDIT: Also for the people buying laptops in businesses and schools obv

    • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      So you’re telling me that if snaps take off and become a standard there’s a good chance I’ll have to use them just to get my drivers? Now I hate them even more!

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        No but you see the drivers will be (must be) approved by Canonical which surely makes things better :|

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is highly unlikely. Snapd is open source so you can just repackage the software for your distro of choice. I don’t think giving users the ability to use both Flatpak and Snap is bad. Though I would put Snap behind a disclaimer due to Snap Store’s history.

      • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Probably not the purpose of this distro but using snaps in this way are a massive benefit for embedded systems

    • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      99% of people don’t understand anything about Snaps except from thinking they’re worse than Flatpak

  • eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This article is far too hypey. One dude has started this initiative and needs people to work on his concept to get it off the ground. I’m not opposed to a red-hat free immutable system, but this one is so far from maturity this article is selling a first drawing like an almost finished product. Remind me in two years how this went.

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Harald, the main architect behind it is already running it as his daily driver. Many others (myself included) are already testing it in VMs and on spare hardware with only very minor papercut issues to be resolved.

      • eldain@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sounds great! I’ll have a look once the user infrastructure is in place.

  • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think gnome is working on the same sort of thing, read here.

    I’m glad to see both going for an immutable os with flatpaks. It’s so much more user friendly for the average person and if you are more technically inclined distrobox makes it a breeze to use it like a regular linux desktop.

    I hope both do well

  • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Ooo damn that sounds exactly what I’d like to try.

    On the other hand I feel like I’m too old for this removed. My system works fine, I understand everything, and things rarely break and never in an unrecoverable way.

    • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The beauty/advantage of Linux Eco-system is one can pick and choose based on his/her preferences.

  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    I use Fedora KDE but this one sounds like exactly what I need. I primarily use Linux for software dev and web browsing and Windows for gaming and Office.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I found out about this yesterday when searching for the KDE sources to make some alterations to the lock screen. I guess this distro is not for me.

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I disagree, because they are not the same thing.

      Immutable means read only root.

      Atomic means that updates are done in a snapshotted manner somehow. It usually means that if an update fails, your system is not in a half working state, but instead will be reverted to the last working state, and that updates are all or nothing.

      I create a btrfs snapshot before updates on my Arch Linux system. This is atomic, but not immutable.*

      There is also “image based” which distros like ublue (immutable, atomic) are, but Nixos (also immutable and atomic) are not.

      only really before big updates tbh, but I know some people do configure snapremoved*s before all updates.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        It means a change either applied completely and successfully, or not at all (think “atomic transactions” in databases).

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Atomic in software refers to an operation that cant be interrupted because it happens in one step. This one of the big selling points of atomic or immutable distros. Your system will not be left in a broken state by cancelling an update because updates do not take multiple steps, unlike traditional distros.

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        How could you install anything or change any setting if it was truly immutable?

        Immutable OS makes sense in certain scenarios, but not in home computing.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Do a little research, dude… Do you think you’re the first person to have those questions/issues? That’s all been addressed.

          I’ve been on an atomic/immutable distro for a few months now (Bazzite), and the experience has been great.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not all. Red Hat started this by naming their immutable distributions with “atomic” (but then not consistently…). Some people agreed, but not everyone.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      How is atomic less confusing? Immutable means that something doesn’t change, atomic means that it’s the size of an atom or has nuclear energy

      EDIT: I’ve learned that some people are overly pedantic about the meaning and practical use of the word “immutable”, so much so that they decided to create a bigger confusion by giving another word a completely different and exclusive meaning

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Atomic in software refers to an operation that cannot be interrupted, like the updates in these distros. Immutable is a more confusing term, as it leads users to believe that cannot control parts of the system, when in reality these distros still have tools to do so.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not semantics, they are two different things.

        And to your edit… Are you upset that there are two different words that mean two different things? I don’t understand.

        they decided to create a bigger confusion by giving another word a completely different and exclusive meaning

        Isn’t this just how words work…?

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        atomic has had a meaning for a very long time in IT, don’t pretend that it’s something made up bullremoved. with this thinking we could just throw out the word mutable/immutable too, what is it my computer is radioactive and I’ll get cancer from it? of course not, because it has a different meaning with computers, and people in the know (not even just professionals because I’m not one) know it.

        atomic means that if multiple things would change, they will either change at once, or if the task failed none of it will change.
        sometimes these are called transactions, suse calls it transactional updates. but is that any better? now the complaint will be that suse must have transacted away all the money from your bank account!

        and distros are obviously not immutable, that’s just plainly misleading. we update them, someone does that daily. updating requires it to be mutable, to be modifiable.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Immutable does not mean “not changing”, but rather that you don’t have the rights to change. If you take the immutable option away, then its changing again, like when you update your system. People who have a problem with the term say, “see its not immutable, the term is a lie!”. Which I kind of agree, but somewhat conflicted.

        Atomic is an attempt to create a new “meaning” with a word, that cannot be misunderstood. Its trying to avoid the situation of “Free” in example. But I don’t like the term Atomic either, because it just suggest to me that everything is split into many little parts and is not self explanatory like Immutable. I’m conflicted here too.

        I’m always conflicted.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Settings live in user space. Software exist in containers like AppImage, Flatpak or Distrobox. If something need deep system integration, they can be layered on top of the system in the user layer. Immutable does NOT mean less control. Just exerting control over the system in a different, usually more systematic, automatic and deterministic way.

          • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ah yes, the immutable OS, except for all of the various mutable parts.

            We should totally not call it anything less confusing.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s not confusing at all… How is this any more confusing than:

              Flatpak - they’re not literally flat…

              Snap - I’ve never seen or heard any evidence of something snapping by any definition of the word I’m aware of.

              Dolphin - what the removed is this, no sea life whatsoever!

              Kate - this is a text editor, not a person.

              Distrobox - not in an actual box.

              etc.

              • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                The main difference to your examples is that an “immutable OS” is in fact mutable, while none of your examples describe themselves with an adjective that is contradicting with their function/inner workings.

                Flatpak is a pretty good name, because it makes software flat in the sense that it avoids having a (tall) dependency tree.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I installed Bottles, but was disappointed when it didn’t actually have anything to do with bottles.

                  If you think every name of every product, etc., is going to be literal… you’re gonna have a tough time in life.