• BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Are you defending snake oil? The pseudoscience con so uniquituously used to deprive the desperate from their money that it became the term used to describe “harmful bullremoved sold for profit?”

    Freedom of choice or not, I suppose you should be able to spend your money however you want.

    But if someone is selling people lies under the promise of medical miracles, we need to throw the book at them.

      • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah, I’m still waking up, so I must have misunderstood.

        I hadn’t considered political spending, but I didn’t get the impression we were talking about super PACs. Those are abhorrent, and undemocratic.

        My stance was that if a person wants to buy something that’s stupid, ineffective, but gives them some small degree of hope and doesn’t harm others, then they should be able to. However, I’m also of the opinion that regulators need to remove those products from the market because they’re lying to people about their efficacy.

        Ideally we’d be teaching people that snake oil doesn’t work. But the current political climate suggests that Big Snake Oil has captured the regulation, so I don’t see that happening either.