Now that Bandcamp has had huge layoffs, what about an opensource, Fediverse-friendly replacement? What can a FOSS product bring to the community and do better than Bandcamp?

  • Discoverability?
  • Broader selection of payments platforms? Direct transfer to avoid processors? (I’m ignorant about the processing system, plus international considerations)
  • Ease of spinning up (SaaS?)
  • Content deliverability (on the fly transcode from sourced FLAC or WAVs? Rich video/multi track audio?)
  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just looked up Monerun

    Monero is not doing “printing currency”. Some exchanges that promise to pay you monero may not hold it. That’s the same what your bank does. The bank seldom has enough dollar bills to pay all of its depositors money.

    But again, this is between an exchange and its customers. You can gasp use another exchange and withdraw your money immediately after using it

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Monero is not doing “printing currency”.

      And you know this because…?

      Right. You don’t. Because Monero is obstinately opaque in its operations. You’re taking it on faith (or, rather, you’re trying to make sure you’re not the bottom of the pyramid when everything goes to Hell).

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not how that works, you prove your claim that monero has coins created in excess of what the protocol allowed. You can’t just make removed up and expect me to debunk it

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The system is set up so it cannot be proved until it’s too late. Like a hi-tech Madoff scheme. It has zero transparency. None.

          In the absence of transparency, the only safe and sane assumption is “a scam is in operation”.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is actually not true, because if you received a transaction that is “printed” money due to some bug, it would be provable. This has not happened