Red Hat stops all upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd (hadess.net)

  • kippinitreal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you explain why “community system” is bad? Genuinely curious, since the word community sounds like it’s not controlled by corpo interests

    • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Community systems are not bad, that’s most of Linux, but there needs to be an ethical, FOSS-friendly enterprise system to get corpos invested in Linux and FOSS. Besides, corporate systems usually have massive dev teams and upstream/open-source a lot of their work. As much as I removed on Canonical and Red Hat, they’ve done immense amounts of beneficial work for Linux and FOSS.

      • kippinitreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That makes sense, thank you. My question above was specifically about Debian, since I’ve heard the point of it being community based used negatively in other places/threads too.

        • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t mean it in a negative light. The issue is that companies prefer to trust other companies, which is why it’s good to have a moral company to point to.

        • woelkchen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My question above was specifically about Debian, since I’ve heard the point of it being community based used negatively in other places/threads too.

          Fun fact: For a few years HP was very invested in Debian because they saw that as the most likely successor to their old HP-UX Unix on mainframe servers.