• ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now, gamers will want to play on Linux for the low latency on online games.

      • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that would make sense as opening TCP connections is not really viable for low latency, hahaha.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Opening the connections is one thing but resends and stream ordering can also cause issues since they might delay the latest information reaching the user space application even if the packet for them has actually arrived just because some earlier packet has not. There can also be issues with implementations waiting for enough data to be available before sending a packet.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Online games don’t typically have many concurrent connections, though, do they? Just the one.

      • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not an expert, but I suppose as this patch is on the kernel and not on the game, this will still improve any connection your kernel needs to do, like sending telemetry of your anti-cheat engine and other apps that make TCP requests while you are playing online games.

    • WMTYRO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, many games where people care about that lower latency tend to be competitive with some kind of anti-cheat that doesn’t mesh with Linux.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re not a cloud server that needs to run this many concurrent connections (probably)

    • Karna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The test data on article is about server setup which is the right use case for this change.

      Moreover the L3 cache on CPU is what makes significant difference, IMO.

      If that is true, not sure how much improvement consumer-grade desktop will see, given that most consumer-grade CPU will not have that much L3 cache on chip.

      • AlexJD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        AMD has been putting a lot of L3 cache on their consumer CPUs. The 5800X3D has 96mb of L3 cache.

        • Karna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that’s true. Only if Intel follows the same in future.

          On a separate note, 5800X3D seems to be most efficient (throughput/watt) consumer grade CPU out there right now.

          • Karna@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s definitely a CPU for server (unless you are a general consumer with lots of $ 🙂 ).

            • qupada@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              There definitely are vendors ignoring common sense and putting socket SP5 on desktop boards.

              No argument about the price, I think list on these is something like $13k USD.

        • dai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man looking at my old 5960x with it’s 20mb of cache from 2014, and Intel’s current top consumer chip with 36mb.

          Crazy to think Intel were ‘ahead of the curve’ so long ago, those x99 chips are still relevant compared to some AM4 chips.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    This effort has been around optimizing cacheline consumption and adding safeguards to ensure future changes don’t regress.

    In turn this optimizing of core networking structures is causing TCP performance with many concurrent connections to increase by as much as 40% or more!

    This patch series attempts to reorganize the core networking stack variables to minimize cacheline consumption during the phase of data transfer.

    Meanwhile new Ethernet driver hardware support in Linux 6.8 includes the Octeon CN10K devices, Broadcom 5760X P7, Qualcomm SM8550 SoC, and Texas Instrument DP83TG720S PHY.

    NVIDIA Mellanox Ethernet data center switches can also now enjoy firmware updates without a reboot.

    The full list of new networking patches for the Linux 6.8 kernel merge window can be found via today’s pull request.


    The original article contains 387 words, the summary contains 124 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • sighofannoyance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    This proves once and for all that Linux is the superior platform!

    when was the last time you heard any such news for PC or MAC?