I’ve always used Windows and am super comfortable with it. I have set up a dual boot with fedora but don’t use it because I have never identified a need to use it. I see a lot of windows hate, so what does Linux have that I need? What can motivate me to migrate? What is a good Linux to have for a desktop + steam?

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My server is Linux and it works great. My PC is Windows because, despite its flaws, it just works. Especially for playing games.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say that I’ve actually got better performance in a few games running under proton

      Linux for the most part just works for games now

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the games you want to play work well on Proton then it’s fine. You’ll receive a minimal performance hit, or on very rare occasions, none at all. Unfortunately something like half the top 10-20 games on Twitch either don’t run on Linux at all, or run really poorly and require a lot of workarounds.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve only really run into one or two games that haven’t worked flawlessly not for lack of variety

          I’m guessing the top games on twitch are probably competitive things with strict anti cheat right?

          • JasSmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I think it’s mostly anti-cheat causing the issues. Still, these are some of the most popular games in the world like Fortnite and Destiny 2 and Valorant.

              • JasSmith@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not sure. I think any effective anti-cheat is invasive. I hate them but I hate cheaters even more.

                • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Games manage to have good anti cheat that doesn’t do that though, I rarely encounter cheaters in overwatch for example and if I have they’ve been really subtle about it

                  • JasSmith@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Last time I investigated this, Overwatch used a very poorly-designed client-side solution called Warden. It’s a signature-based detection system, similar to antivirus. It looks for process IDs of known cheats. There is also some server-side heuristic detection which looks for impossible player stats that reveal rage-mode cheating. Again, this is easily defeated to the point that it doesn’t work at all because cheaters know about it and spend the first few minutes of the match firing into walls and floors to dilute their stats. Detecting process IDs is useless when you can just make some minor changes and recompile every few days, which is exactly what the subscription-based hacks do. It is a naive and amateur solution, and because of its flawed architecture it can never be effective.

                    The only serious anti-cheat in any game is in Valorant. It’s a kernel module that can detect low-level hacks. Overwatch’s anti-cheat runs in user mode, and all the serious hacks use HID drivers that are recompiled periodically to prevent signature detection.