A little admiration of how easy UI customization is on Firefox, and how removedty Chromium looks.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have no idea why people use #Chrome. #Firefox looks so much better,

    Reason n1: Firefox’s font rending sucks; Reasons n2: Chrome dev tools are better and way more supported by whatever ecosystem you develop in.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Try these settings on Firefox in about:config

      gfx.font_rendering.cleartype_params.enhanced_contrast = 100
      gfx.font_rendering.cleartype_params.pixel_structure = 5
      gfx.font_rendering.cleartype_params.rendering_mode = 5
      gfx.font_rendering.fallback.always_use_cmaps = true

      I cannot use Firefox without them. They adjust the text rendering to be more… normal, I don’t understand why they aren’t default, but maybe things change at higher resolutions (but I don’t own a 2160p monitor to test).

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’ve accidentally fell into a Linux space, my bad! This will work on Windows, I’m not sure of alternatives on Linux, I gave up using it before I could play around with Firefox.

          Try looking for aliasing options under gfx.font_rendering and trying them out.

          • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sooo you mean “Windows has horrible font rendering” ;D I think on KDE its fine, some say GNOME is better but idk.

            • warm@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              No, Windows has good font rendering actually. It’s very much just a Firefox issue on Windows.

              • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                No offence, but I used to think Windows had good font rendering while I was using it. That was until I started using Linux distros. Now every time I boot into Windows, I again remember how awful Windows looks in comparison - washed out, pixelated, gives me eye strain…

                • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  never in my years of using Linux have I ever thought that it was rendered clearer. let’s be honest with ourselves, no need to lie.

                  • Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    It’s a function of PPI, hinting settings, font face, etc. The both of you can be correct in your own right…

                    Objectively there is a long history font rendering issues under linux though, so… eh.

                • warm@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Linux’s looks more blurry to me, Window’s is much sharper. Maybe at different resolutions it changes though, you need less aliasing at higher res.

                  • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I have the inverse - where Windows is so fine and pixelated it looks blurry. Linux is sharp and legible. It may be to do with with sub-pixel rendering. And this has been the case for across multiple computers and laptops, windows versions and Linux distros.

              • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Strange, I always find it extremely ugly when using Win10 and I think Win11 has improved a lot but not entirely. Its so square-ish for some reason

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      For frameworks treating Chromium as app development platform like Android. Firefox dev tools are much better for typical web development.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Firefox dev tools are much better for typical web development.

        Not true, not even close. That was true like 15-20 years ago, but nowadays, especially when I’m debugging Angular (yes the extension for chrome is better) and developing stuff that will be used by people who go for Chrome.

        • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          You say Angular. But what else can we expect for a framework for making WebKit/Chromium apps. Angular working in Firefox is an afterthought because it has very much similar featureset.

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve to work with what I got :P Either way even if I was doing jQuery or Vue (like I did in the past) I wouldn’t ever use Firefox because even without the Angular extension, just plain JS/CSS debugging I like Chromium dev tools more.

            Besides the fact that my target users are always Chrome users and by using Firefox for development in the past I run into issues because specific features would work in Firefox but not on Chrome and vice-versa… or some piece of CSS rendered differently Chromium offers a level of polishness on small details that Firefox wasn’t ever close to. Firefox’s dev tools are always playing catch-up time to Chromium’s, that’s what I see.

            Maybe I’m biased like you seem to be, but in the opposite way :P

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Chrome dev tools are better and way more supported by whatever ecosystem you develop in.

      But what if you’re not a web dev?

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s fair, but I still wouldn’t trade the amazing font rendering that chromium offers.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Chrome dev tools are better for JS debugging, but Firefox wins with everything else, IMO. Especially their flexbox, grid and font visualizations and debug tools are amazing.