• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That really does sound like a bag of hurt.

    But it also sounds like a fuller alternative to what the big guys offer. And in the long run it would make it a well rounded space and protocol.

    It’s too bad that it sounds like it both isn’t straightforward to implement properly, and attracts heat.

    I wish them luck. Privacy and security would be great. People do use these spaces as direct messaging platforms. Even if it’s not the best all around idea. As social spaces evolve, the way people message evolves too. Making it secure earlier in that cycle is good.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lemmy (at least lemmy.world) has relatively little appetite for edgy content even compared to reddit. Look at the communities and instances that have been banned already.

      It may be worthwhile to offer secure deletion of stored DM’s after some interval, even if they are stored in the clear. I posted some code for that a long time ago. Maybe I can dust it off of rewrite it.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I just feel like the obvious choice is to build a system to seamlessly connect from activitypub to an existing secure messaging platform. Reinventing the wheel like this is just a waste of resources imo.