• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    The author argues that you don’t need to use the terminal but constantly argues that you should. The average computer user doesn’t even know which version of Windows they’re using. Many don’t even know if they’re using Windows or Mac. Until Linux gets over the obsession with the terminal we’re never going to have the year of Linux.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I disagree. Many people like to have control over there computer even if they don’t want to learn a bunch of new skills.

      Linux isn’t for everyone but its gotten to the point where someone could figure it out if they so choose. It no longer is the unstable mess it was 10-20 years ago.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      What’s wrong with using the cli? People act like it’s some arcane dark magic…

      You’re typing things in a small box here rather than clicking on icons to reply. Sometimes text is just better.

      • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The problem with the cli is you need to memorize a whole bunch of new words and syntax in order to do anything. You also need to memorize what not to do so you don’t accidentally erase your system while using rm or cp or whatever.

        Even something as simple as copying and pasting, which works the same in every single other program has new rules in the terminal. I mean, think about that. If you’re just learning bash, then the first thing you’ll be doing is copy pasting commands. But even that has the hurdle of 'oh, I guess this is the one program where ctrl-c means something else

        Like, how do you look at sudo, cat, man, and apt, and think ‘yeah that’s intuitive’. And forget about multitasking, new users won’t even know how to quit most programs (is it ctrl-q? Just q? Esc? Ctrl-c? Ctrl-d? Wait how do I undo that, is it ctrl-z? Wait where did the thing go

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you want a non-terminal os based on linux you just have to make something like android or chromeos or steamdeckos.
      Those are and pretty popular, so I don’t know who can claim linux is “terminal obsessed” it’s just a kernel and there is a wide diversity of os based on it.

      Debian , fedora , suse etc might all be “obsessed” with the terminal.
      For me that’s just the obvious economical way to offer features. decent GUI costs a lot more to develop and document - so you have to have less features for a given amount of dev time. Or you have google /valve/microsoft type amounts of resources to spend.

      I always thought this “year of linux” thing was a meme to make fun of canonical or idiotic tech journalists .
      Is anyone realitsitcally interested in volunteering their time to win over legions of Microsoft fanboys. removed me sounds like hell.

      And frankly the use of terminal is going to be far from the first blocker to linux adoption for those who don’t even know they’re using windows or mac.