i liek attachments moar
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
i liek attachments moar
This PR doesn’t add that, but anecdotally I’m fairly sure it already works for Mastodon… Not a Mastodon user, so I can’t find any examples though. They definitely show on Mbin tho.
speaking of which… when will the “upload from URL” button actually work‽
oh wait, they removed it?
…yay?
basically what cabbage said. same goes for mastodon posts in subs
All of Mastodon’s moderation has always been done and federated by individual instances.
that’s a… specific… instance name…
it makes sense!
i like cringe dance videos but i think the problem’s gonna be the volume
because for some reason, torvalds is bad now because he is a capitalist while nearly everyone is a capitalist. that’s the argument made.
I’m done explaining.
(Internet slang, derogatory) An effeminate or unmasculine man.
A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]
Dubliette is referring to the thought-terminating cliché that every major US party doesn’t want to abolish capitalism (the economic system centered around capital, private ownership, etc.), ergo we’re all liberals.
Freeze peach doesn’t mean you can call people "fag"s. By using that word you’re 1. insulting those who express their gender as they wish 2. calling us names
Also, my point is that there is precedent for laws to geopolitcally restrict open source. I agree that there is a real security issue.
I didn’t link to that!
How is this a conspiracy theory‽
why the removed are we using that word here? just read the article yourself, “auteur de war” sans nees
I’m giving an example of sanctions applying to software.
dbzer0 is only as thematic as ml is imo