Not needed what…?
Not needed what…?
I agree, if the data loss is no issue and there is no need to recover anything, just start from scratch.
The color grading of the years is really bad. The last 20/30 years are all very low in contrast compared to each other, while 1940s and 60s are easy to tell apart, where it is least important. There are so many more colors than yellow/orange/brown, we can use them to get more information density.
But you do “give fluff”, there is a reason you posts random links. You want someone to see something, but do not want to talk about it, which I find odd.
I now understand why you get downvoted.
What is this link supposed to tell us?
I made that with an ESP32 and a Cree LED array that gradually gets brighter. Settings etc. via browser.
Not sure how an app is supposed to do that.
That’s not the point, which is that the results are indeed mostly very similar, unlike what OP claims.
I never said that only looking at p values is a good idea or anything else like that.
If we only look that those with p <0.05 (green) and with 95 % confidence interval, then there are 17 teams left. And they all(!) agree with more than 95% conference.
What do you mean, all different? Most are exactly the same. The first 4 are a bit low and the last 3 a bit high, but last 2 and first also extremely wide, so irrelevant anyway. Everything else agrees, most within >99 % confidence with only slight differences on the absolute values.
Removed by mod
Everything you say is correct and, to me, obvious and was never disputed.
I think the hair analogy fits this case, obviously it is not 100 % the same.
Shouldn’t that be obvious? The same way a bundle of hair is softer than a rod of the same thickness. The extreme of this are sandwiches like carbon - lightweight core - carbon. There, the parts that experience the biggest forces (the outermost layer in tension) is extremely stiff, while the core only needs to withstand compression to keep both apart.
In any case, I can highly recommend AccuBattery. I love how they counter bullremoved from the “battery University”.
Good. Why did he then fell the need for absurd key combos?
Hahaha, thank you. In windows that would be even more efficient, since a few letters will be enough to identify something unique. Win, f, i, enter
What happened 2014…2016 that there is that noticable jump?
That is such a basic feature that it should not even have to be mentioned.
It is exactly NOT about me, but about every random person who stubbles across your post.
I was trying to tell you how to increase impact. If your don’t care about this (constructive) criticism, then YOU need to move on.
My example should be plenty good enough to get the point across.
I would argue they are just what was used during development. After that, it never changes.
Why did they use it back then? Were there many alternatives? I do not know.