This is my lovechild of a NES with a Famicom Twin
Looks closer to a Virtual Boy.
I’m just a weird, furry, pan guy (cis he/him). I also have a big, blue username.
If I was a character in Danganronpa, my talent would be The Ultimate Loser and I’d be the first character killed in the murder game.
This is my lovechild of a NES with a Famicom Twin
Looks closer to a Virtual Boy.
They have/had stuff for VR?
Edit: Oh yeah. They had a VR browser but it’s a full environment one which is far less handy than simply using the android version of Firefox on the overlay screen in whatever environment I am already in.
What’s stopping that same 7 year old taking TomHanks@Lemmy.World before the real Tom Hanks even knows about Lemmy?
It’s not the lack of unique usernames that’s a problem. It’s the lack of identity verification. Which, I mean, understandably is lacking because it’s not like there are high profile people making accounts here. Well, except of course for Margot Robbie.
I see most of them are on the same “lemy.lol” instance.
Watch 'em removed up and cut the wrong cable and now the entire country of Russia doesn’t have Internet access.
A small home media server running off a raspberry pi could be that cheap.
Only if it didn’t have an insane markup for being pre-built.
Display Name field. You can use whatever you want. Even emojis. The feature is already in Lemmy; but not every instance has it available. Lemmy.World does use it, though.
Would this work if I opened a link from an app to the browser? Or does it have to be a link clicked on within the browser?
Also what if the home instance uses a directory other than the default /c/ for communities?
Think of it like a nesting doll.
Instances have communities (or magazines).
Communities have posts.
Posts have threads.
I made a comment thread on your post to this community on the Lemmy.World instance. Other than the usage of instance for a social media type website, this has been the lingo of the net for several decades. You would have simply replaced “instance” with “specific website.” (Though the usage of “instance” to refer to a duplicate server has been around since at least the mid to late 90’s if not longer)
As if that would at all stop these dumbass challenges from being posted and copied? People have been hurting themselves copying something they saw someone else doing even before the invention of the camera.
What if I’m inhouse instead of intent?
$150.
(Also usually speed and/or capacity along with higher quality components)
How do mods see them? As far as I am aware, you have to be an instance admin. But it’s not difficult or time consuming to spin one up and I doubt the average user of Lemmy is technically incapable; most of the Fediverse users in general seem to be IT people and developers.
They basically already are, if you run an instance. Might as well make it easier.
First thing I ever designed from scratch was a stash box… Thing. Not really a box but it held vape carts, a stash jar, lighter and matchbook, my pipe and my battery along with dab accessories.
Really need to make a new one though. Don’t have the same pipe or battery anymore. Not even sure I still have the original print packed away when I moved to share a pic. I will say, having some calipers to measure funky shaped things is handy, though.
My instance doesn’t even make the list. 🥲
I find mine worth it. So many things I’ve had to replace entirely just because some random plastic part would break, but I can just replace the broken plastic part now. Custom light switch and electrical outlet covers, custom keyboard key caps, case shells for various things (like phones and controllers), not to mention all the unique things others have engineered specifically for 3D printing like the Lego-like organizing containers that are infinitely scalable.
I love it.
How severe is this vulnerability?
Is that why the last few haven’t made any sense to me? I’m missing the back story?