A backup is an emergency protection, not a primary plan. This attitude is dangerously close to making the backup a critical part of their uptime.
A backup is an emergency protection, not a primary plan. This attitude is dangerously close to making the backup a critical part of their uptime.
Well, with multiple users you’d need to decide what the use case is for the whole NAS and then work down from there.
Are you sharing everything in the NAS with everyone? In that case your NAS setup is fine, just a little permissive, because with RW to everything, the end users can break everything.
If it were me setting this up, I’d have different mount points for different users. 1 mount for each user that only they can read/write (not even you should be able to see it), and 1 mount that everyone can read/write, maybe if you want to go a little bonkers, 1 mount that everyone can read, but only you can write to.
Then you’d mount those three to separate mounts in your /media, and you can link them from your home directory for specific use cases.
Obviously this is completely overkill, but you can take the parts that sound appealing to you and ignore the rest.
How many users are there?
Is there a chance that the computer will boot without access to the NAS (aside from failure conditions).
Are you doing anything with ownership to prevent reading, or changing, sensitive files?
0:36 Gaming.
4:38 Microsoft Office.
5:31 Photoshop.
7:15 Ecosystem of Linux.
9:39 Hardware compatibility.
Engagement and creation of worthwhile content. Memes are fine, but it’s junk food. The more meaty content that creates engagement and discussion, the better.
Controversy also creates discussion, but drives out quality.
Post news from quality sources, educational content, breaking stories, and ESPECIALLY good, fun, discussion and content around hobbies.
(งツ)ว
Wow, never occurred to me before, but this is such an elegant, and simple solution.