![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/52321401-ef47-458e-9aad-72fc8b3aabb5.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
Your second monitor was not broken by Ubuntu. Your second monitor was no longer receiving a signal. The distinction is that the second monitor was functional but not compatible.
Your second monitor was not broken by Ubuntu. Your second monitor was no longer receiving a signal. The distinction is that the second monitor was functional but not compatible.
Come try our pizza, it’s #1 in the country
Thanks. I only just noticed myself.
I know this is an old post, but removed me running, Alexandrite is rad. Thank you!
If so, I misunderstood this and thought it was for Threads and I stand corrected.
Even if he was, why would this excite you? Whenever something goes mainstream, enremovedification begins.
Why?
One thing is for sure: you don’t use an apostrophe when you make things plural.
You want everything just handed to you or what? You’re asking for cheap, best, and easy. At some point you need to decide what your goal is and accept that you’re going to have to compromise.
Your mom.
This is my preference. Is that not OK?
I don’t need all the overhead. Vi has always worked for me. It’s ubiquitous. I’m fast with it. It suits my needs fully.
Yeah, no.
If ‘esc-u’ doesn’t work, I :q!
,
Omg. I’ve hated emacs for 30+ years and you just made it worse.
You don’t seem to understand the distinction. You monitor isn’t “broken.” It wasn’t rendered inoperable by Ubuntu. It simply wasn’t compatible with the way you set it up.