Saik0

Works fine in GrapheneOS…

Well… No offense… but duh? It’s not like OP can migrate his spouses “Spouse@gmail.com” address to his mail server.

I was under the assumption (and I could be wrong) that OP owns the domain… And wants to run their mailboxes. If she wants to keep her own mailbox and use it, just forward it to her gmail if that’s what she wants. I’m also not insinuating forcing someone into something.

I own my domain(you guessed correctly) and host my own emails. My spouse does use an inbox on my server(actually a few)… If she didn’t want to anymore she can open a mailbox where-ever she wants… and I’ll even forward whatever I get to her. That’s it. Wouldn’t stop me from running my own inbox on my own server. And I’m not forcing her to do anything at all. She can use it or not.

This is the mentality I have when I made the previous comments. Just forward her stuff off, she can go wherever she wants.

Until the basement floods and the server goes offline for a few days

That’s what backups are for.

or botched upgrade that’s failing quietly;

See above

over zealous spam assassin configuration;

That’s an assumption that you’re using this specific product.

What’s funny is you think that all of this can’t happen to your stuff on Google’s servers either for some reason… Say the wrong thing in a Youtube comment? Boom whole google profile banned. All your emails are gone too.

Or random software that interfaces poorly with each other (https://support.google.com/mail/thread/142335843/all-of-my-emails-have-disappeared-how-can-i-recover-them?hl=en)

SMTP is stupidly forgiving. You’re not going to magically lose singular emails.

But one thing is for sure, my wife won’t have any of it. She’s a total backwards thinking give me windows or I’ll jump kind of Gal.

So… forward her inbox to her personal gmail account? Keep your mail server as it was for you?

you would realise security even without the cloud is critical to protecting systems

Wazuh, the software I specifically called out. Is not “cloud”. They offer a cloud service, yes (that’s how they make money, on lazy admins or orgs that are too small to house their own infra). But it is self-hosted and designed to be run within the network.

You clearly have no idea what the current security market looks like. Nor what half of the terms you use actually mean.

Edit: Forgot to address this too

Virtualising every single system endpoint is practically impossible, which Wazuh seems to rely on.

No. The agent can be installed on ANY system. They recommend you install the orchestration/control node virtualized, which you don’t have to do. You can install it on a raw system though that would be a huge waste of resources. You seem to have missed that.

It is clear what you engaged in was attempting to malign all Lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml users

By pointing out the correct answer to a persons question?

Are you okay? You realize that my answer was basically the same as the other answer given by the lemmy.ml user in a different part of the thread. Just not an essay’s worth of content when a sentence is sufficient.

You are a piece of removed. If Kiwifarms goes after people like you

So a call to action to dox people? Why are you threatening people and calling them names? Aren’t you a mod? I mean you might have a case or argument if the votes weren’t kept on the platform itself.

The latter is beyond lacking in open source ecosystem

And yet software like Wazuh (https://github.com/wazuh) exist… Which are complete SIEM and XDR platform. Which does more than any antivirus could ever dream to do. But somehow OSS security is lacking? Sounds like you haven’t looked at the security field seriously in decades. Kaspersky doesn’t lead the pack in anything and it isn’t in a “level field”. Quite the contrary Antivirus as a concept has been commodified in IT. They’re all generally drop in replacements for each other and are not what is actually used to prove to security auditors that systems are secure. You may get %1 detection differences between platforms or maybe an update 30 minutes or an hour earlier. This is generally meaningless and the modern tools actually used to prove security go way deeper than an antivirus.

Lying to yourself is never going to solve problems.

Seems to work for you though?

Nothing you do on ANY activitypub-based platform is “private”. This platform is outright public. A bit disappointing that you still haven’t figured it out, especially as someone who purports to care about privacy in any capacity.

Removed by mod

Because being critical of a Russian company = racism. At least according to lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml users.

Removed by mod

Not sure how I feel about that, to be honest.

You should despise it (though I won’t judge you if you don’t). It makes people reliant on the bot rather than reading the removeding article. The only time a bot like this is useful is if the article is paywalled. The bot will miss pieces of the article that matter to the context of the whole situation, up to and including details like “Who” wrote the removeding thing… or “when” it was published. That context data matters a lot.

I don’t remember the specifics but it was to reduce the risk of breaking third-party software coded with some janky way of determining Windows versions.

Probably lazy detection for windows 95/98… The 9 might get parsed for those much older OSes…I know many apps were compatible with both 95, and 98… So they might just do a lazy check that 9 exists and call that “compatible”. When a windows 10 named 9 might not necessarily be.

However, knowing how much old removed is still compatible in Windows, I’m not sure this would have been that much of an issue.

That means that Windows 10 is NT… 10.0. Windows 11 is also NT 10.0.

And likely windows 12 as well…

And versions of windows 10/11 have the same issue too… v1507, because it was released in July 2015
v1511, Nov 2015
v1607, Aug 2016
v1703, April 2017
v1709, Sep 2017… wait… oh no that’s Oct (17th) 2017 (actual, but close enough)
v1803, April 2018
v1809, Sep 2018… god damnit, I mean Nov 2018 (actual, 2 months later?)
v1903, May 2019
v1909 Nov 2019
v2004, May 2020
v20H2, Hoctober 2020
v21H1, Hmay 2021
v21H2, Hnovember 2021
v22H2, Hoctober 2022…

Windows 11 isn’t any better

21H2
22H2
23H2
24H2

It’s just a mess… it was “good” for a while then turned to straight removed… Where the removed is 22H1? I consider 2004 supposed to be 20H1…Why even bother with the H2 for Windows 11 at all? There’s never an H1… They don’t correspond to build numbers or anything like that at this point anyway. I think it’s supposed to correspond to halfyears? What happens when they have to push a second version in the second half of the year? Do we get 24H2v2?

I hate companies that removeding change their versioning more than once per product.

They’re already stealing the content. You think a license is going to stop them from doing it anyway? Who says this license is valid in any jurisdiction that the comment is being held on (yay federation!)? Who says that a random user submitting something to a public forum where data is stored by third parties in order to run that forum can be licensed anyway?

If my server makes me money in some form, and you submit stuff after the fact and license it yourself, that doesn’t magically apply nor does it bind the server owners to anything. Unfortunately the comment you submit to a homeserver doesn’t actually belong to you at that point.

Case and point, the community we’re in !linux says licensed under CC BY 3.0, and this user claims CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, but the community has not necessarily given him the right to post ANY license attached to his comment and still post. conflicting licenses would be at play. And this is ignoring that lemmy.ml may not have granted either !linux OR the user to apply their own license to content, you know… since they’re storing the data and own the server/service.

It would take even the most junior of lawyer to get it thrown out. Especially since it’s fair use to report on the goings on of public. Even if that reporting agency makes money by reporting on the comment.

And during anti-cheat outages… Turns out the games play fine with proton.

Not sure what vlc would help with. So I have to use a very specific DE in order to get the functionality? Does this really sound like the linux way to you? Getting forced to use particular stuff to get something to work?

Gaming performance is actually better on Wayland.

*on some games…

Did you read your own source? They covered:

Cyberpunk2077 (slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, slight advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
DiRT Rally 2.0 ( X.Org is clear winner…)
F1 22 (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
GTA V (Clear advantage to X.Org Nvidia only… Since AMD was having driver issues with this game)
Hitman 3 (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
Metro Last Light Redux (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
Total War: Three Kingdoms (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
X-Plane 12 (Slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, clear advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)
Quake 2 RTX (slight advantage to Wayland on AMD, slight advantage to X.Org on Nvidia)

Where “slight” is within a few frames… let’s call it 0-5 frames… and clear advantage is ~10 frames+…

It’s clear that X.org is better overall. It’s capable of giving the user more options in hardware with less bullremoved.

No, there are remote desktop,

Care to share some then? Specifically ones that allow remote control without local access to grant permission.