TehPers

Is this supposed to be a leading question? I’m not making the decisions, but there’s no reason to be happy about losing contributors in any case.

It’s supposed to put the LF in line with sanctions rather than at risk. They have no control over the invasion (aside from pushing a malicious patch that shuts down all Linux systems or something)

My understanding is that users can edit the chat themselves.

I don’t use c.ai myself, but my wife was able to get a chat log with the bot telling her to end herself pretty easily. The follow-up to the conversation was the bot trying to salvage itself after the sabotage by calling the message a joke.

I’ll give it about two weeks before some random court in Texas tries to block it.

200V refers to the gen then? I saw the article mention some CPUs in the 200s so I guess that makes sense.

Odd choice to go with a V suffix though for a part that would probably explode if provided 200V power (at the usual current levels it draws anyway). Imagine a laptop CPU that draws 2000W and is somehow an improvement over previous gen - actually, that’s a very Intel thing to do now that I’m thinking about it.

I think we’re gonna need some updated naming wheels for the new generations of processors. I have no clue if a “Ryzen AI 300” is supposed to be a high-end, mid tier, or budget processor, nor what the Intel Core Plus Ultra whatever (that somehow draws 200V power?) is.

Reddit makes an anti-user change. In other news, grass is green.

I haven’t been on the site in over a year and nothing since then has convinced me to go back. Maybe I’m lucky that I’m not in any Reddit-only communities, but it could also just be that I treat those communities as though they don’t exist and never had a reason to join one as a result.

From the article:

Western-owned brands manufactured in China, such as BMW and Tesla

Looks like you’re safe buying a Tesla.

If this chart is being used solely to represent BMI of a population and is not actually measuring health, it does seem a bit misleading. At the very least, the other comments do seem to be misinterpreting the chart as being representative of the health of a population.

I’m of course not saying that the US health-wise is any better than the chart represents. Just that as is, the chart is at best useless (except under super niche circumstances) and at worst misleading.

BMI alone is not a good metric for populations, unless you also acknowledge the error rate. This study, for example, found that it was very inaccurate when used as a sole measure of obesity. From the abstract:

Using BMI categories as the main indicator of health, an estimated 74 936 678 US adults are misclassified as cardiometabolically unhealthy or cardiometabolically healthy.

In a population of around 330 million, that is around a 23% misclassification rate.

BMI is not a good measurement of obesity. Atheletes who are hyper muscular can be considered obese by this metric, for example.

I don’t doubt that obesity is bad in the US, but I do hope they used a better metric than BMI to measure it.

I’m also curious what metrics they used to measure obesity.

We’ve been trying to contact you regarding your car’s extended warranty.

I agree, open source devs don’t owe anyone anything (unless they’re accepting commissions or something). Also, generally speaking, being a good developer does not translate to being a good community moderator. There should be no expectation of the latter.