It could be a bumpy road, but go for it. Remember that no matter what happens, someone else has probably been there before and has asked for help online
It could be a bumpy road, but go for it. Remember that no matter what happens, someone else has probably been there before and has asked for help online
For privacy and security? Yes. For usability? Noooo.
Trains are not the only way to travel. Your definition of ‘need’ is so broad as to encompass most of the economy. Organizing society on the basis of that kind of thinking has been tried and the results are invariably disastrous.
I did read the article, I think the fine was too harsh for an honest mistake. But I wasn’t responding to the article, I was responding to someone celebrating the railways losing money because of people not paying their fares.
Kids don’t have jobs and people don’t choose to get sick. People do choose to ride trains. Do you just think nobody should ever pay for anything? Haven’t we seen enough times how that works in practice?
It’s still a fare they could have charged, calling it something different doesn’t change the fact that someone has to pay to keep the trains running. Why should the taxpayer be the one on the hook? If it’s such an important service the people who use it would be willing to pay for it.
Does this also apply to public train companies? Would you prefer everyone just drive everywhere?
You are the living embodiment of cringe wokeness and the fact that you’re being downvoted even on a left-wing platform where basically everyone is already against racism should make you question some of your life choices.
So we just need three more of those and we’re good.
Depreciation and Leasing, yes
The Reddit admins have the lessons of Digg seared into their collective memory
Who says the entire band needs to fit on stage? It’s not the 90’s anymore, gosh.
I’m surprised you didn’t make low vehicle ownership green and high vehicle ownership pollution-colored.
TFW you didn’t read the label and brought home a sad clown for dinner