ITT: Lots of people who have no idea how the tech works and couldn’t be bothered reading the comments before posting
ITT: Lots of people who have no idea how the tech works and couldn’t be bothered reading the comments before posting
SpaceX’s bid price was $680 million. The source selection statement did not reveal a price for Northrop’s bid other than saying it was “significantly higher.” Based on NASA’s budget request, Northrop’s bid was likely approximately twice as high.
But SpaceX did not just win on price. Its “mission suitability” score, effectively its technical ability to design, develop, and fly a vehicle capable of deorbiting the space station, was 822, compared to Northrop’s score of 589. SpaceX’s approach had one weakness, compared to seven weaknesses in Northrop’s bid, according to NASA evaluators.
Finally, the selection was also based on past performance by the contractors. SpaceX’s performance was rated as “very high,” given how it has delivered with the Cargo and Crew Dragon spacecraft and its Falcon 9 rocket. Northrop’s performance on Cygnus and its various rockets was given a “moderate” rating. Overall, the NASA evaluators expressed a “very high level” of confidence in SpaceX being able to complete the mission, whereas a “moderate level” of confidence was expressed in Northrop.
Yeah, not seeing the problem here.
In short, only one company—SpaceX—is thriving in NASA’s commercial space ecosystem.
That is not a great position for the space agency to find itself in, so there are plenty of questions for NASA and policymakers. Do they cave to traditional space contractors and go back to cost-plus contracts for most services? (Slow and expensive.) Do they turn over many of their spaceflight functions to SpaceX? (Not desirable or politically practical.) Do they continue to hope and wait for other companies to make the next step? (The early returns are not great.)
As compared to the past, when NASA was doing all 3 at once?
Yeah, 3rd party links are a tougher nut to crack. You’d think they could at least fix the local links, though.
I can think of a few potential solutions, but they’d all require a lot of user opt in and centralisation, which makes it unlikely to ever happen.
You’re missing the point. You should never leave your home instance. Lemmy could automatically remap links to whatever your home instance is before you ever click on them.
You’ve never seen superfans print out and bind a webnovel, huh 😛
I’ll go out on a limb and guess China was mentioned somewhere
Not really any different on lemmy, sadly
Why are you attacking somebody who’s backing you up? Sheesh
Kind of sad how many communities are on .ml. Would like to block the entire server but lose too much content.
Not really, given there would have been test runs approved by NASA first
I disagree.
Probably unmodded and open to automated signups leading to troll and bot infestations.
IKR? Couldn’t they have run it through a spellchecker before registering the domain?
There’s no ‘if’, they already are.
The same thing currently stopping them: nothing but time and effort.
No, anybody can currently do this.
That’s the issue with decentralisation. The info is out there. It’s that or trust a megacorp with it.