You‘re supposed to host this yourself.
You‘re supposed to host this yourself.
Set the DNS cache time to 60 seconds.
Set the script to run on every host delayed by some time to avoid simultaneously accessing the API (e.g. run the script every other minute).
With this approach, you get automatic failover in at most 3 minutes.
I’d host it on both webservers. The script sets the A record to all the servers that are online. Obviously, the script als has to check it’s own service.
It seems a little hacky though, for a business use case I would use another approach.
OP said that they have a static website, this eliminates the need for session sync.
Your challenge is that you need a loadbalancer. By hosting the loadbalancer yourself (e.g. on a VPS), you could also host your websites directly there…
My approach would be DNS-based. You can have multiple DNS A records, and the client picks one of them. With a little script you could remove one of the A Records of that server goes down. This way, you wouldn’t need a central hardware.
Looks like a small release, but has some IMO pretty interesting changes, like
Allow users to view their own removed/deleted communities
and
Add backend check to enforce hierarchy of admins and mods
You can trim it even further:
For a start, try hosting something in your own home. A raspberry or an older PC or laptop should be enough.
My first projects were a print server (so I can print via wifi) and a file server. Try to find something that is useful for you.
Only start hosting on the internet when you’ve learned the basics and have more experience.
It seems like a tedious workflow, but the end result is quite good.
Interesting. What is tge reasoning behind only fetching the comments vs. a full fediverse integration?
When the switch was released, everyone already had a smartphone capeable for gaming. This was not the case in 2004.
If I understood the original PDF correctly, this contains all models of the generation. This applies also to the different GBA models.
I think counting fediverse users is about as difficult as counting e-mail adresses.
If you vote, post or comment, you count as active user.
I agree, but I understood this question in the context of a homelab.
And for me, a homelab is not the right place for a public website, for the reasons I mentioned.
No, with these reasons:
I have a VPS for these tasks, and I host a few sites for friends amd family.
Just one open source example … freeradius has an option to log passwords:
log {
destination = files
auth = no
auth_badpass = no
auth_goodpass = no
}
Or another example: The apache web server has a module that dumps all POST data, with passwords, in plain text:
mod_dumpio
allows for the logging of all input received by Apache and/or all output sent by Apache to be logged (dumped) to the error.log file. The data logging is done right after SSL decoding (for input) and right before SSL encoding (for output). As can be expected, this can produce extreme volumes of data, and should only be used when debugging problems.
I don’t agree that this is “absolutely malice”, it could also be stupidity and forgetfulness.
This is not about facebook not hashing credentials, it is that they appeared in internal logs.
Facebook is probing a series of security failures in which employees built applications that logged unencrypted password data for Facebook users and stored it in plain text on internal company servers.
Source: Krebs on Security
It’s quite obvious from the context
I like it :) Can you provide a link to the sensors you used?