I have used all 3 major BSDs (Free, Open and Net). FreeBSD is ideal for servers due to its performance. OpenBSD is perfect for security appliances and NetBSD is perfect if you have exotic legacy hardware.
Funny that those descriptions contradict what these Distro actually aim to do. NetBSD is a the supposed performance oriented distro. FreeBSD should be able to do both, desktop and server. But your are on point with OpenBSD.
Using a security focused Distro which has its use case in network devices as a “daily driver” shows that you priorities are “elsewhere”.
no dotted zeroes = no terminal use
COSMIC is Rust, Iced, Smithay, Tiling, customisable, Wayland-only (and thus Wayland-first),
what is iced? i dont care about smithay, why should I? customisable as a feature? ever DE is except Gnome, I guess?
Also, create a settings GUI. This isn’t the 1960s.
rofl
Who is Ted Ts’ in this context?
old white man scared of losing their jobs or their commits going insigificant…who cares. Lets move on.
Have fun with linux then.
exactly, otherwise she needs your help
Something doesn’t work so instead of fixing I am looking for alternatives…
Tbf, your blog is also just digital paper. :P
So funny that almost nobody got certs working in IT, same for me basically, I have a BA in Business Administration and thats it. ^^;
Old hardware runs better on Ubuntu than on Fedora or Tumbleweed? Nani?
Thanks for this service, but whats the point if the server’s cant handle their task?
First problem is, how would you know if your battery life has been halved? Are you keeping track of how long your battery lasts on a daily basis?
that is such a bad response, mindboggling.
troll detector noisy
😂