doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.
That’s false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.
doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.
That’s false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.
Im really confused why people think TPM needs to be involved in anyway when using LUKS.
Because it’s convenient
The disk will be decrypted on boot, but then they’ll have to contend with needing a password to log in
I mean that it was easy. It was low handing fruit. It basically shouted “I’m a leftist” on its own.
This one was basically a freebie
Others have expanded, but it may be useful to try to break out of the typical idea of ownership.
You give YNAB a shot?
As far as ads go - you can use adguard’s public DNS server without installing anything and it’ll block most ads on mobile
My understanding is that defederation only affects content that’s native to the instance that was defederated. So in your example, users of instance A and instance C would be able to interact on instance C.
I want something similar to multi-reddits. I want to mix and match communities to my hearts desire into one big feed. I also want to combine duplicate communities from different instances to the same feed.
It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find out that they are trying to make trans people look bad.
On Windows, I like NAPS2. I haven’t tried it on Linux, though
Notice how you’re ignoring the machine management and selectively choosing to focus on the user management. User management might be fine with Linux, but machine management can’t compete with GPOs, especially for managing Windows clients, which is what businesses are using for workstations whether we like it or not.
I like Linux a lot, but saying you can’t understand why someone would run Windows on a server just shows a lack of knowledge. Linux is great in a lot of server applications in the application realm. However, it doesn’t get close to the power of Active Directory and Group Policy for Windows device management. Besides that, a lot of people are more comfortable with a UI for managing DHCP, DNA, etc in a SMB environment. Even if they prefer a command line for those tools PowerShell allows those people to coexist with those that prefer a GUI. Under certain circumstances, (mainly ones where a business is forgoing AD for AAD), Linux can be the right choice. Pretending that there’s no place for Windows Server, though, is asinine.
Sounds like a job for tin foil or parchment paper