Too bad that Purism’s stated values are the opposite of their real business practices.
Too bad that Purism’s stated values are the opposite of their real business practices.
Programs shouldn’t get confused since RAM/swap is transparent for them.
I used GNOME for close to 20 years, but finally dropped it with the release 40. I’ve had enough of them breaking features.
By that time KDE finally stabilized and it does everything I want, my way.
If the child grows up in a post-apocalyptic wasteland however it’s not going to have that footprint.
I guess you’re joking, but this whole thing is about preventing this scenario…
An instance hosting a community might
become unstable disappear forever defederate or become defederated from/by my instance same for the instances of other users of that community
I kind of get this, but:
Communities can have the same topic, but differ in moderation style policies regarding if and how bots are allowed
Also possible, but in most cases a large majority of community members can certainly agree on some compromise.
Why are communities split? If you’re right and there’s really no good reason, then how comes this phenomenon occurs so often?
I think the mods of the duplicate communities should join forces, agree on uniting the communities and close all but one (the other pointing to the united one).
I don’t think there’s really a good reason to keep communities split. (there are of course contingencies where it makes sense, like rogue mods etc.)
The biggest issue was the phone - Librem 5 - many customers waited 4 (or 5?) years and what they got was underwhelming. Purism originally provided “refund anytime” policy, but once customers started using that they lied they didn’t promise that (disproven with wayback machine). The only reliable way to get the money back is to sue them in small court. They also had some other shady stuff.
Everything was simple and straightforward except for updating an app after new release before the distro maintainers updated it in repos (which often took months).