Still not as good as native package

Firefox?

I don’t think that this one is as reproducible and declarative as NixOS or Guix.

Ubuntu Server (for school) -> Fedora (daily driver for a month) -> Arch (same as fedora) -> NixOS (it’s almost a year and I think that I’ll stay with NixOS)

AFAIK they didn’t. This time we have natural growth

No alt right, no nazis, no terfs.

How it’s possible to enforce this on self-hostable software?

deleted by creator

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel#Officially_supported_kernels

Arch Wiki has a nice short summary of kernel variants

Yeah, but sort of unofficially… I wait for this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/259641

I really appreciate that they’re working on new desktop environment. I’ll probably switch from Hyprland to Cosmic once it’s available on NixOS

PopOS would be better (IMO)

Another one?

X11 is a protocol too. Xorg is the binary you are talking about

You can contribute to Nixpkgs without GitHub account

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/about-the-patches-category/477

Aux is more similar to Nix, than Guix is.

Guix uses the same concepts, but still is very different.

Exactly!

Good idea, but It would hard to cooperate efficiently when there is money involved. And I don’t think that Mastodon devs would join this union.

On the other hand, I believe that separate organisation focused on interoperability, long-term goals, defending from Meta, etc. would be great.

It could be forced by law

Both

Filesystem Hierarchy Standard

/bin, /dev, /home and all that stuff