• refreeze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have been reading about this since the news broke and still can’t fully wrap my head around how it works. What an impressive level of sophistication.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And due to open source, it was still caught within a month. Nothing could ever convince me more than that how secure FOSS can be.

      • Lung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        97
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Idk if that’s the right takeaway, more like ‘oh removed there’s probably many of these long con contributors out there, and we just happened to catch this one because it was a little sloppy due to the 0.5s thing’

        This removed got merged. Binary blobs and hex digit replacements. Into low level code that many things use. Just imagine how often there’s no oversight at all

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, and the moment this broke other project maintainers are working on finding exploits now. They read the same news we do and have those same concerns.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Bug fixes can be delayed for a security sweep. One of the quicker ways that come to mind is checking the hash between built from source and the tarball

              • Lung@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                9 months ago

                The whole point here is that the build process was infiltrated - so you’d have to remake the build system yourself to compare, and that’s not a task that can be automated

          • Corngood@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            9 months ago

            I wonder if anyone is doing large scale searches for source releases that differ in meaningful ways from their corresponding public repos.

            It’s probably tough due to autotools and that sort of thing.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was literally compiling this library a few nights ago and didn’t catch removed. We caught this one but I’m sure there’s a bunch of “bugs” we’ve squashes over the years long after they were introduced that were working just as intended like this one.

          The real scary thing to me is the notion this was state sponsored and how many things like this might be hanging out in proprietary software for years on end.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yea, but then heartbleed was a thing for how long that no-one noticed?

        The value of foss is so many people with a wide skill set can look at the same problematic code and dissect it.