• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    You really went looking for something to hate on there didn’t you. That is the only sentence in the whole article that even mentions power consumption, all the other arguments both fit and against are for a variety of other topics.

    The rest of the ridiculous moralizing was pretty bad as well. This was just the most egregiously stupid thing listed in the article.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought your comment was more ridiculous

      1 person making a query has thousands of hours of computing behind it

      1 person compiling software themselves does not

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not saying AI is not energy intensive. I’m saying the team who developed the least efficient Linux distribution throwing shade about AI being “energy inefficient” are hypocrites.

        • Kacarott@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But again it wasn’t the team, and it wasn’t " throwing shade" it was one guy, who listed it as one reason against AI. Power consumption is also a valid reason against using gentoo. People are able, and indeed should be aware of potential problems and downside of things, even if they are involved in other things which also has those issues. I am sure most of the gentoo team would readily acknowledge that energy consumption is a downside of gentoo compared to other distros.