Dropped your /s

So every state under 425 sucks balls yeah?

Actually I’m not sure if WI deserves that, are they cool?

“West Germany” huh

I think that might be possible but costly?

If there’s a person (or bot) that claims to be unbiased but spams every political post with a biased assertion of the OP’s partiality/impartiality with a huge post that is low effort copy+paste/script-generated, the correct response is to ban that person (or bot).

This is nothing new to online communities, but this instance seems to be struggling with this.

Got a department of labor in your state?

Much of the problem lies in the type of sand needed for construction, with desert sand “largely useless to us” as its grains are the wrong shape. “Eroded by wind rather than water, they are too smooth and rounded to lock together to form stable concrete,” explained the BBC. “The sand we need is the more angular stuff found in the beds, banks, and floodplains of rivers, as well as in lakes and on the seashore.”

Fascinating. I wonder if the rounded desert grains could be processed in such a way as to make them angular, say by crushing?

“Now, we are running out”

Uh, elaborate?

2011 was the year of sequels

Jan 1st and Dec 25th both less common than Feb 29th? Sounds unrealistic.

You are entitled to delete your Lemmy app of choice and return to the corporate-approved Reddit™ content-consumption experience.

Actually I have heard of some insane mods

User loobkoob@kbin did so in their comment. You can simply not use pronouns. Your hypothetical doesn’t include a “just don’t say the thing” option.

For me, downvoting posts means either “this post is not appropriate for this community” or “this post is not appropriate for the ‘all’ view.”

If the community is not relevant to my interests, I just block the community.

Edit: actually, after reading your post, I amend my earlier list. I also downvote posts if the author is an arrogant cock nugget.

You don’t know whether someone has a good reason for downvoting or not, and every time you think you do know, you’re making yourself a little dumber.

The point of the second half is to try to dissuade others from simply relying on initialisms. It causes introspection. Maybe accusing others of being angry is uncalled for? It’s possible to want to prompt introspection in others without being angry.

What you are doing is called the straw man fallacy. Obvs pedophilia isn’t a kink, and you would know I wasn’t defending it if you had good reading comprehension skills.

The nazis in this story are the ones who want to eliminate an entire instance due to impurity.

I’m more of a milf guy but keep pushing your narrative if it makes you feel special.

It is not asinine to want person x to not get punished for person y’s crime.

Including an instance in a search is not aiding and abetting.