• ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suppose this doesn’t take into account more humane animal farming? Like not keeping a million chickens and three long barns? Or pigs with a livable space?

    • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The thing with pigs is: they eat a metric removed-ton, so a lot of that land usage is to grow grain for feed.

      That’s the vegans’ main point – we grow food to feed it to our food.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        pigs are mostly fed crop seconds or other waste product. it’s just not true that we are growing food exclusively for pigs.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yes, although I suspect we’d actually make less soy oil without the demand for feed. I’m honestly not even sure what it’s used for; most of the vegetable oils on sale where I live are different.

              The corn case is pretty unambiguous. DDGS is a byproduct, white grease is probably a byproduct (maybe of pigs, which is “fun”), the rest looks purpose-made but isn’t relevant here.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I suspect we’d actually make less soy oil without the demand for feed.

                i don’t know how we could prove this.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  It’s the perpetual problem in economics, right? That’s fine though, I think I’ve made a reasonable case, and this isn’t a court trial with an explicit standard of proof.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Byproduct does not equal waste product. Plastic is a byproduct, so is gasoline. Your conflating the ideas.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The use predates the creation of it. There had already been a use for it the moment it was made. It has never once been considered a waste product except in the style of argument you are making right now.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            you don’t feed pigs corn that you could sell to humans. there is a reason it ended up in the barnyard instead of the grocery store.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, you specifically plant feed corn, instead of grocery-type corn. Also why stealing corn cobs off the roadside can backfire.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                field corn is also used in ethanol production, and the stalks and cobs become fodder, which, yes, is also feed, but it’s a highly efficient use of the plant and land, given the outputs.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I don’t think you could grow sweet corn at the same volume/efficiency. if you could, why wouldn’t you? it’s more valuable per pound

            • addictedtochaos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              and you have lots of corn for vegan food products, and the chemical industry, and biogas production, and much more.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, that would make it even worse. I’m not sure by how much though, because like the other person said this is representative of cropland.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They still haven’t figured out a way to humanely slaughter animals let alone keep them in fulfilling environments that would be impossible to tell from their wild counterparts.

      We can’t afford to let animals live full lives. Pigs are butchered at 6 months but can live decades naturally.

      We haven’t even begun to approach the conversation of maybe possibly being able to in the maybe distant future being able to consider a humane way to keep animals and then also harvest meat from them when they pass.