Oh, AutoDesk…you have such a way with words. Honestly, I would rather learn to design in OpenSCAD than send AutoDesk a single penny.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the thing people wish for was a little bit of polish in their open source tools.

    I love kicad, but it used to have some really rough edges in spite of being simpler compared to something like Altium.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The FOSS stuff can do the job. You just need to tweak these 10 config files because it doesn’t come with sensible defaults. Oh, and it’s built against a different version of those libraries. Better downgrade two and upgrade that third one. Actually, just fork and modify the source. Much easier. What were we trying to do again?

          • snowe@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s flatpak and why in the world would I need to know about it in order to use a cad program? Do you see why people don’t use this stuff?

            • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You mean when people just ask someone else instead of heading to the single best information resource that’s ever existed in human history for an immediate answer?

              No. I don’t see why people do that.

              • snowe@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I making a point that you seem to be missing. If you have to point out some way to get around a problem that any given user will have with a piece of software, then that’s why your software is not being used. This is the continual problem with the Linux community, they think that everyone wants to learn this stuff. Most people just want their software to work. They don’t want to have to do any sort of googling to figure out why it’s crashing or why it’s running slow or why it doesn’t have this or that feature. Every time someone like you tries to point out that someone can just google something you lose another person that may have been willing to use FOSS in the future. Instead, maybe go try to fix their problem because they sure as hell aren’t going to.

                • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  First, YOU missed the point in the original context which is different versions of different libraries may be needed to run software. Flatpak solves that particular problem.

                  Second, I don’t owe you or anyone tech support, nor do I care about your satisfaction level with software. Use it or don’t.

                  If you’re the kind of helpless person who has to be spoon fed answers, then perhaps Linux or FOSS isn’t for you, and other alternatives exist that have professional support staffs.

                  You act as though inputting the same information (“What is Flatpak?”) into a search engine instead of a random comment on a random forum is just A BRIDGE TOO FAR. That’s a pathetic attitude, but plenty of people will still step up to help the helpless. I just don’t have to spend my free time being one of them - though I often have when it’s obvious they’ve already at least tried to find an answer on their own.

                  • snowe@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you’re the kind of helpless person who has to be spoon fed answers, then perhaps Linux or FOSS isn’t for you, and other alternatives exist that have professional support staffs.

                    you’re the exact kind of person making FOSS look bad to the majority of people. Since you don’t seem to realize, I run the programming.dev instance. I most likely have been working in tech longer than you. This kind of attitude you have towards “people should just learn everything about every piece of software they use” is why people like you shouldn’t be near open source software at all. You make it removeding impossible for people like me to get anyone to even try FOSS because all they remember are morons like you saying “just figure it out”. I’m not going to teach my mother in law what a removeding flatpak is and there is absoremovedinglutely no way that she is going to be able to google it and figure it out. It has nothing to do with learned helplessness. It has to do with the fact that she’s a painter, not a tech guru, and gatekeeping FOSS by purposefully making it hard to use is such an idiotic thing I have no clue how you could even defend it. Your actions make big tech companies become more entrenched in people’s lives. It is by your hand that people don’t want to use things like Firefox.

                  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    This is it exactly. The foss works fine and does the job these guys are just whiny bitches who want everything handed to them in perfect condition…but without conditions.

                    Oh no I have to mod a config file to make it do what I want…why can’t the devs just read my mind???